Michael J. Fox and the Socioeconomic

Canadian-born television and film actor, Michael J. play a trick on was diagnosed with Parkinsons unsoundness at the old age of thirty. In his memoir, Lucky Man, fob reveals how he has been spiritedly struggling with the indis authority, by in addition trying to help separate long- scurvys ugly from the illness with no be cured _or_ healed. As a matter of fact, the man has been trying very(prenominal) hard to convince the government as wellspring as aesculapian exam exam interrogationers to visualise a cure for Parkinsons Disease. hold has been an advocate for stem cells research to boot, and takes that a cure to Parkinsons Disease could be strand within ten eld time, provided that we directly begin to put our pay to good implement, that is, to find a cure for the disease by means of research. bedevil continue his acting complainter for nine historic period after he had been diagnosed with Parkinsons. What is more than, the man continues to be a public fig ure with his advocacy for medical checkup research to find a cure for Parkinsons Disease. Countless(prenominal)(prenominal) community suffering from Parkinsons Disease make the closet over public manner for the fear that they might lose their remnant before the public eye. This is non the instance with play a joke on, as mentioned before. On the contrary, Fox has been adapted to bravely fight his disease with t emerge ensemble the public endorse he has already ga in that mentiond. Moreover, the man has the money to push for medical research in the bea. He withal has the funds to manage his wellness portion out b make headway than do those sufferers who come from get socioeconomic backgrounds. Fox explains it thusId been stipulation a forget me drug to think rough, non least the fact that I wasnt the still one who had done my time in the closet. And the more I thought about it, the more it struck me just how plush,well-appointed, and skilful my consume closet had been. My financial aider, my position in the world, andmy pecuniary situation gave me advantages in confronting the disease that most of my fel upsetP.D.ers could only vision about. And now, having publicly identified myself as a personliving with Parkinsons disease, there was lilliputian to keep me from playing an active agent role.Indeed, I was ide everyy positioned to step into the subdue left by all in all those patients who had so oft more to lose by going public. I had a lot to be grateful for, and now found myself with aunique opportunity to father something back (Out of the Closet Into the Classroom).There were confused entities resideed in exploiting Foxs position in the world with respect to his disease. While mint that do non enjoy the privileges that Fox enjoyed in his financial situation while suffering from Parkinsons Disease, remained closeted, Fox was approached by a miscellanea of nation that wanted to use his interest in medical research to tru ly find a cure for the irritating disease. After all, Fox was also bestow toward helping people with the disease with his own finances. Thus, he mentions continued public support in his life with Parkinsons DiseaseBy the end of 1998, my desk was clicked with rest bearing the letterhead ofvarious Parkinsons organizations crossways the country. All of them wanted my help in one wayor a nonher. The call of some of these groups implied a national reach, that on closerinspection they rancid out to be local organizations interact with universities or hospitals oreven single researchers. Some were not set up to address research at all instead, theywere dedicating their time and re origins to more basic patient concerns, cargongiver supportgroups, quality-of-life issues, and other worthy considerations (Out of the Closet Into theClassroom).Fox is, indeed, a well-to-do man, who has been transaction with Parkinsons Disease much smash than do those who set out not the kind of fi nancial view and position in the world as his. In point of fact, it has been well documented that people from around the world who ar wealthier and better educated do experience better wellness than those with depresseder socioeconomic backgrounds who restrain both less wealth and less education. Smoking, poor nutrition, as well as physical inactivity are more prevalent in groups that are clinical depression in socioeconomic consideration.Additionally, low socioeconomic groups get down little or no rise to power to preventive health care, for example, fastness health checkups and screening programs. These medical function are easily accessed by people from broad(prenominal) socioeconomic backgrounds alone. What is more, financial barriers to health care are more apt(predicate) to perpetuate the existing disparities in health among different socioeconomic groups (Veugelers and Yip).People from low socioeconomic backgrounds are unable to buckle under pricey heath s ervices that may save their lives. Neither can they chip in expensive health insurance that would cover the kinds of health services that Fox may be using at wassail to fight the disease he is suffering from. As compared to Foxs comparatively successful struggle with Parkinsons Disease, the low socioeconomic groups attain to bear a great burden of disease. Correspondingly, people from low socioeconomic backgrounds have a greater quest for health services (Veugelers and Yip). adept research study revealed that specialist medical services are underused in the suit of lower socioeconomic groups, and this widens the socioeconomic gap in health care (Veugelers and Yip). concord to another study, lower socioeconomic groups are more believably to use the Medicare managed care menage health as compared to high socioeconomic groups.Not only do people from lower socioeconomic groups need greater care, but they also affirm on Medicare because they are unable to render alternat ive options. In fact, evidence suggests that 15.5 share of Medicare plan enrollees living below the privation line use home health during a year, as compared to only 11.2 part of people who live above the poorness line. Moreover, those who belong to the lowest socioeconomic groups have almost twice the odds of persons from the highest socioeconomic groups to use the Medicare plan. People who are relatively higher in socioeconomic office than those in the lowest socioeconomic group, have approximately 1.5 measure the odds of other people having a home health visit (Freedom et al.) agree to Freedman et al., people from high socioeconomic backgrounds might believe that the Medicare managed care home health is an inferior good. In other words, people from higher socioeconomic groups are more apparent to use alternative options like help living and the hiring of esoteric assistance alfresco the benefits of Medicare (Freedman et al.).such(prenominal) options are believed to gi ve access to better home health care to the aged. All the similar, these options are only procurable to those who can afford them. In the actor that he is, Fox may be assumed to be using private assistance in the home. Although he is not aged, the man is expected to have leased someone qualified by now for his home health care. Regardless of the rectitude of this assumption, the fact remains that Fox is dealing with his illness with better health which may inpart be referable to his supreme mind set. Apparently, he is not bearing as great a burden of the disease as do the people from lower socioeconomic groups. Fox reveals his positive mind set through the illness, in a dream he had, speaking of his farm and fresh produceIts hard to process what Im seeing. It cant be possible, but inside this tight, dark, airlessspace, a channelize has been growing. Growing isnt even the word for it, really, its abruptly favourable. In response to the tight quarters its taken on the appea rance of a bonsai shoetree. Thetrunk and branches are thick, and now, with the door flung open, the tree continues to growright before my eyes, as if in time-lapse, new branches reaching out into the airy light of thekitchen and bursting into leaf (Los Angeles, bump into 1995).While Fox dreams of growth and thriving, research reveals that even kids from low socioeconomic groups are doing poorly in terms of health. As a matter of fact, low socioeconomic status is also connected with worsened outcomes on health status measures much(prenominal) as mortality, acute and chronic conditions, in addition to self-rated measures of health.Contrary to Foxs positive mind set in his struggle to beat Parkinsons disease, is the controvert mind set of adolescents from low socioeconomic backgrounds who are more likely to drive suicide, and engage in heavy drinking. These youngsters are also known to be more depressed and obese. Furthermore, poor children and adolescents are give less attention at times when they are suffering from injuries that require medical attention. They additionally face retardation in growth (Newacheck et al.).Children from poor households have little physician contact, do not have access to a regular cite of primary care as well as sick care, and are less likely to have continuity in the midst of the sources of regular and sick care. As compared to the poor, children from high socioeconomic backgrounds obtain required health care, have a regular source of health care, and are known to sire any care from the doctor that is deemed necessary. Such children are also more likely to be seen in the doctors office (Newacheck et al.).It is obvious that the socioeconomic cause on health care reach all age groups at the same time. The young and the old are as well as affected by their financial status with respect to health care. Unfortunately, everybody does not throw the financial status and position in the world that Fox possesses. Nevertheless, th e man is work to bridge the gap between the haves and the have-nots in terms of health care. Funding medical research on Parkinsons Disease, Foxs behavior is aligned with his positive mind set that envisions growth and thriving.We may expect such growth and thriving to be experienced between all corners of society only when the difference between the haves and the have-nots is eradicated. Although this difference has everlastingly been, and may always be, it is possible to provide better health care to low socioeconomic groups. According to Veugelers and Yip, universal health coverage, such as Medicare, may already be bridging the gap. sluice so, people such as Fox continue to have access to better health care than those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds.Works CitedFox, Michael J. Lucky Man. New York, Hyperion, 2002.Freedman, Vicki A., Jeannette Rogowski, Steven L. Wickstrom, ass Adams, Jonas Marainen, and Jose J. Escarce. socioeconomic disparities in the use of home health s ervices in a Medicare managed care population. Health Services Research, October 2004. Newacheck, capital of Minnesota W., Yun Yi Hung, M. Jane Park, Claire D. Brindis, and Charles E. Irwin Jr. Disparities in adolescent health and health care does socioeconomic status matter? Health Services Research, October 2003. Veugelers, P. J., and A. M. Yip. Socioeconomic disparities in health care use does universal coverage reduce inequalities in health? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, June 2003.